From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82825-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14881 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2011 20:18:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 14826 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2011 20:18:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:17:49 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p74KHgCL018159	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:17:42 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p74KHfWI016695;	Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:17:42 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p74KHeQ4006758;	Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:17:41 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Eliminate tui_command_loop
References: <201108042110.45405.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:18:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <201108042110.45405.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2011 21:10:45 +0100")
Message-ID: <m38vr9ylqz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

[...]
Pedro> It seems TRY_CATCH ended up save/restoring uiout
Pedro> due to the nature of incremental improvements only,
Pedro> not because it was thought it was required.  Good.

Nice research.

Pedro> -    tui_command_loop,

I think this was the last user of the command_loop_proc field.

Tom