From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20261 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2011 16:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 20206 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2011 16:17:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:17:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7OGH7O8020100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:17:08 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7OGH5ew007024; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:17:06 -0400 From: Phil Muldoon To: Andrew Oakley Cc: Tom Tromey , Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Some Python ideas, looking for feedback References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D583A2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <201108161345.33448.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D585D2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <20110817193710.59945561@ado-gentoo> <20110817201316.64fc14e5@ado-gentoo> <4E54C8C6.3020309@ado.is-a-geek.net> <4E54E47E.8050101@ado.is-a-geek.net> Reply-to: pmuldoon@redhat.com X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4E54E47E.8050101@ado.is-a-geek.net> (Andrew Oakley's message of "Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:46:06 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 Andrew Oakley writes: >> Didn't Eli already approve it? > > Oops, it looks like he did but it just hasn't been committed yet. > >> If so, do you have FSF paperwork filed (I'm not a maintainer, so I won't >> hazard a guess if this is ok to be posted by another committer). > > The paperwork has already been done (I'm not sure it's really necessary > here anyway). If you have maintainer approval, FSF paperwork approved and filed, and write-after-approval status, you should check it in. Cheers Phil