From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24262 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2011 14:16:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24254 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2011 14:16:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:16:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p95EGEjw005735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:16:14 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p95EGEFI017329; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:16:14 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p95EGCAF002968; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:16:13 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Kevin Pouget Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC - Python] New ObjFile event References: Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Pouget's message of "Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:10:18 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Pouget writes: Tom> I think it is best to pass it as part of the event. Tom> It is ok with me if you also want to have it set the current objfile. Kevin> I got rid of the "gdb.current_objfile ()" access to the objfile and Kevin> kept only the "NewObjFile.new_objfile" attribute of the Event object, Kevin> which indeed makes more sense. Kevin> I've updated the code and documentation accordingly; could you please Kevin> tell me if it seems good for you? It needs another doc review. One nit on the code: Kevin> (gdbpy_current_objfile): New global variable. Kevin> * python/python.c (gdbpy_current_objfile): Make global. Now that you aren't setting this in the event generator, there is no need for these hunks. The code bits are ok with that changed. Tom