From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85209-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10239 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2011 16:30:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 10212 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2011 16:30:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:30:20 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFGUJL3008039	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:30:20 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFGUJxg016507;	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:30:19 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFGUIGt030508;	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:30:18 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
References: <m3obx184iu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111028221459.GA28467@host1.jankratochvil.net>	<m3ty6nzhkk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m38vnxrkxz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111104074543.GA13839@host1.jankratochvil.net>	<m339dyk1v6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3aa85f8io.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3vcqmpg0i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:30:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3vcqmpg0i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon,	14 Nov 2011 14:10:05 -0700")
Message-ID: <m38vnhnyat.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> I plan to commit this sometime this week, barring objections or
Tom> comments; after the doc patch (forthcoming) is approved.

I'm having second thoughts about this.  Today it seems slightly crazy to
check in such a huge patch just before a release.  Any other thoughts on
this?

Tom