From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17423 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2005 17:48:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17399 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2005 17:48:13 -0000 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com (HELO devserv.devel.redhat.com) (66.187.233.202) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:48:13 +0000 Received: from alligator.red-bean.com.redhat.com (vpn26-14.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.26.14]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8QHmAkE030045; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:48:11 -0400 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: tolerate bogus Dwarf macro info References: <20050926162836.GA6510@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20050926162836.GA6510@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:28:36 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > It breaks at stdarg.h. Presumably this has something to do with > #include_next; have you submitted a GCC bug report to go with this? Not yet; that'll be next. >> This failure is covered by the existing test suite, if the test >> programs are compiled with the -g3 flag. > > But since no one really tests that way, it's effectively not covered. > Could you add a manual test case to the existing DWARF unit tests, > please? Sure thing.