From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5495 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2009 00:10:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 5486 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2009 00:10:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:10:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2E09ESe027202; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:09:14 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2E09Ejl030706; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:09:14 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-113.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.113]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2E09DiH028197; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:09:13 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 675F93782B5; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:09:11 -0600 (MDT) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , Andre Oliveira Loureiro do Baixo , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR exp/9103 References: <20090311153711.GA5197@caradoc.them.org> <1236803010.11106.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090313232515.GD30693@adacore.com> <20090313233712.GE30693@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090313233712.GE30693@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri\, 13 Mar 2009 16\:37\:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> I see that option (3) doesn't work very well for you, which is Joel> unfortunate. I don't know iconv all that well, but from the web page, Joel> it seems like it's just a few functions. Can we provide a trivial Joel> implementation that just does nothing, as if the charsets were Joel> identical? Sure. I will implement this. Joel> If that doesn't work, then I'm ok with adding this to the list Joel> of build dependencies, since we have --with-libiconv-prefix Joel> (I assume that this will allow us to build GDB with a static Joel> version of libiconv if the path points to a static-only install). Yes. I've even tested this sort of build :) Tom