From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: RFC: don't let CHECK_TYPEDEF yield a value
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37i2dz8v4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
While reading stack.c I noticed this code:
type = CHECK_TYPEDEF (SYMBOL_TYPE (sym));
while (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_REF)
type = CHECK_TYPEDEF (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type));
Because CHECK_TYPEDEF side-effects its argument, this can change the
type of a symbol. That seems like a bug to me.
I thought perhaps CHECK_TYPEDEF would be safer if it were explicitly a
statement, that is, if it could not yield a value. This does not make
it completely safe, but it does help emphasize the difference between
CHECK_TYPEDEF and check_typedef.
All the other CHECK_TYPEDEF calls appear to be safe.
Built and regtested on x86-64 (compile farm).
Let me know what you think.
Tom
2009-03-25 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* gdbtypes.h (CHECK_TYPEDEF): Don't yield a value.
* stack.c (print_this_frame_argument_p): Use check_typedef.
diff --git a/gdb/gdbtypes.h b/gdb/gdbtypes.h
index 816a208..3c4e948 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbtypes.h
+++ b/gdb/gdbtypes.h
@@ -1185,7 +1185,10 @@ extern struct type *lookup_signed_typename (char *);
extern struct type *check_typedef (struct type *);
-#define CHECK_TYPEDEF(TYPE) (TYPE) = check_typedef (TYPE)
+#define CHECK_TYPEDEF(TYPE) \
+ do { \
+ (TYPE) = check_typedef (TYPE); \
+ } while (0)
extern void check_stub_method_group (struct type *, int);
diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
index f185841..c780348 100644
--- a/gdb/stack.c
+++ b/gdb/stack.c
@@ -181,9 +181,9 @@ print_this_frame_argument_p (struct symbol *sym)
/* The user asked to print only the scalar arguments, so do not
print the non-scalar ones. */
- type = CHECK_TYPEDEF (SYMBOL_TYPE (sym));
+ type = check_typedef (SYMBOL_TYPE (sym));
while (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_REF)
- type = CHECK_TYPEDEF (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type));
+ type = check_typedef (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type));
switch (TYPE_CODE (type))
{
case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 19:56 Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-03-25 20:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-03-25 20:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-03-26 2:28 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m37i2dz8v4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox