From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20066 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2010 17:29:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 20055 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Aug 2010 17:29:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:29:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o76HTn0p004149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:29:50 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o76HTnI7029450; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:29:49 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o76HTjuK013333; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:29:48 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 264FD3782ED; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 11:29:45 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: swagiaal@redhat.com (sami wagiaalla), gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] smart pointer support References: <4C5C36F1.9040800@redhat.com> <201008061648.o76Gmk3o008780@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201008061648.o76Gmk3o008780@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:48:46 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Weigand writes: Ulrich> In *some* cases, the value will in addition be of type Ulrich> lval_memory meaning that the value is also present in inferior Ulrich> memory, *and you know where*. Along these lines, I'm curious to know why value_must_coerce_to_target returns 0 for TYPE_CODE_STRUCT. Maybe that is just an oversight? Perhaps it should also check for lval_internalvar_component? Tom