From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25634 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2011 15:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25623 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2011 15:24:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:24:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p17FOS8W027663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:24:28 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p17FOSAI004311; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:24:28 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p17FORL4018196; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:24:27 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4CE13378326; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:24:27 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Mike Frysinger Cc: toolchain-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libdecnumber: start a gitignore References: <1297059100-13432-1-git-send-email-vapier__34363.9684761458$1297059122$gmane$org@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Mike Frysinger's message of "Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:18:51 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes: Mike> but i guess thinking about it a bit more, if the dir/file exists in Mike> the gcc tree, then all changes need to go through gcc-patches ? Yeah, I think that is the general rule. Tom