From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30607 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2011 15:33:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 30598 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2011 15:33:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:33:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1SFWxrZ009313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:32:59 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1SFWxF4032641; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:32:59 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1SFWwe3029825; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:32:58 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 074883784EE; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:32:57 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] WTX-TCL support module References: <1298569763-18784-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1298569763-18784-15-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20110225180923.GL2495@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110225180923.GL2495@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:09:23 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00898.txt.bz2 Tom> I guess I want us to be clear that build breakage for this is expected. Joel> I think that's fair. I don't see what kind of virtualization you Joel> are proposing that would help with that. You could do it in theory by dlopening all the needed libraries. This is much more trouble than it is worth. Tom> I am not super fond of a top-level command named "tcl". Joel> I wasn't sure about that. I don't mind changing it. I thought that, Joel> since it's another intepreter like Python, it might make sense to Joel> put it in the top-level namespace. But I can either make it a subcommand Joel> like "wtx tcl", or if you have another command name in mind, let me Joel> know. wtx is fine by me, or even maint. Tom