From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22992 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2011 16:38:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 22974 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2011 16:38:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:38:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p93Gc95Q028778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:38:09 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p93Gc8kF016876; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:38:08 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p93Gc7sm022847; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:38:07 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Kevin Pouget Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR/12691 Add the inferior to Python exited event References: Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Pouget's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:15:56 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Pouget writes: I didn't see whether this one went in yet or not. Kevin> There was a discrepancy between the version of the patch you approved Kevin> (http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-08/msg00659/0001-PR-12691-Add-the-inferior-to-Python-exited-event) Kevin> and the one I originally submitted (I certainly missed a step during Kevin> the April->August update in the git tree): [...] Kevin> so I think it has to be re-approved. For avoidance of doubt, this is ok. thanks, Tom