From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22668 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2011 18:30:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 22654 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2011 18:30:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:30:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA2IUYi2030371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:30:34 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA2IUYMP009730; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:30:34 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA2IUW5J029463; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:30:33 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Sanjoy Das Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: JIT Reader References: <4EA9095D.5070408@playingwithpointers.com> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4EA9095D.5070408@playingwithpointers.com> (Sanjoy Das's message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:03:49 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sanjoy" == Sanjoy Das writes: Sanjoy> +static int Sanjoy> +jit_reader_try_read_symtab (struct jit_code_entry *code_entry) [...] Sanjoy> + gdb_mem = xmalloc (code_entry->symfile_size); Sanjoy> + if (target_read_memory (code_entry->symfile_addr, gdb_mem, Sanjoy> + code_entry->symfile_size)) Sanjoy> + { Sanjoy> + status = 0; Sanjoy> + goto cleanup; Sanjoy> + } It is not at all clear to me that target_read_memory cannot throw an exception. I think it would be safer to wrap this in a TRY_CATCH. Tom