From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85255-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21872 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2011 16:11:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 21854 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2011 16:11:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:11:34 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAGGBVpG001158	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:11:31 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAGGBUrb010455;	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:11:31 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAGGBTbc002915;	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:11:29 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
References: <m3obx184iu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111028221459.GA28467@host1.jankratochvil.net>	<m3ty6nzhkk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m38vnxrkxz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111104074543.GA13839@host1.jankratochvil.net>	<m339dyk1v6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3aa85f8io.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3vcqmpg0i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4EC3DA13.4060907@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:11:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <4EC3DA13.4060907@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Wed, 16	Nov 2011 23:43:15 +0800")
Message-ID: <m37h30jbda.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> writes:

Yao> +FAIL: gdb.cp/ovsrch.exp: break A::B::inner::foo if (a == 3)

Yao> I'll debug this problem tomorrow, but if you have any clues, that will
Yao> be helpful.

What is mysterious is that I do not see this failure.
I actually think this test should fail, because it is applying a
condition in a scope where there is no variable 'a'.

I will debug it today.

Tom