From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14755 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2011 14:57:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 14724 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Dec 2011 14:57:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:56:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBKEuk4r026162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:56:47 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBKEukDi017131; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:56:46 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBKEujPA001586; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:56:45 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Luca Pizzamiglio Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: wrong bfd recognized References: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Luca Pizzamiglio's message of "Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:13:40 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Luca" == Luca Pizzamiglio writes: Luca> I've found a strange situation where gdb's configure script fails to Luca> use libbfd and disable ELF support. Luca> the problem was that during configuration, the /usr/local/lib/libbfd.a Luca> was used, instead of the gdb's one. This library was compiled with Luca> libintl support, then the bfd's test program build failed. Are you adding -L/usr/local/lib to LDFLAGS? If so -- why? Luca> This patch should solve this issue, building bfd's testing program Luca> using the gdb's one. I wonder whether it would break something. If you can find another spot in the src configury that does it this way, I guess I'd be more inclined to just do it. This needs a ChangeLog entry. Tom