From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22507 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2009 16:54:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 22497 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2009 16:54:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:54:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3DGqWna006438; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:52:32 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3DGqYfi028966; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:52:34 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-138.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.138]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3DGqVO2004369; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:52:32 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6D8EF378181; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:52:30 -0600 (MDT) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Define EILSEQ if not defined by errno.h References: <83zlennh8p.fsf@gnu.org> <200904112026.46999.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83r5zyop89.fsf@gnu.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83r5zyop89.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun\, 12 Apr 2009 00\:27\:34 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Eli> I'd like to hear Tom's opinion as well. Tom? I agree with all of Pedro's comments. Tom