From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24734 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 17:38:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 24726 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 17:38:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:37:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA9HbYru012017; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:37:34 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA9HbXo1010061; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:37:34 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA9HbWsd008275; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:37:33 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0665A3782CF; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:37:32 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Add support for --without-zlib (take 2) References: <20091102232319.GJ4531__1176.19579327783$1257204230$gmane$org@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20091102232319.GJ4531__1176.19579327783$1257204230$gmane$org@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:23:19 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> Tom: I tried to think about how to integrate ourselves better with Joel> GCC's configure option (--with-system-zlib), but I couldn't think Joel> of anything nice. Thanks for looking. Joel> I think GCC should have implemented optional in-tree support the Joel> way you did for iconv. The situations aren't totally analogous. zlib is always in the gcc tree, and for gcj (and now I think, LTO), it is not an optional dependency. Tom