From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] On-demand loading of shlib's debuginfo
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m362mvfqlh.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107211158.45196.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:58:44 +0100")
Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2011 21:53:14, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:23:49 +0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> > With that in mind, we decided to tackle this problem progressively, and the
>> > first part of the solution is ready for submission.
>>
>> That is currently it still touches the solib files on disk for the purpose of
>> solib_map_sections so that will be a different patch, looking forward.
>
> I had skimmed the patch only, and reserved commenting until I had
> a chance of reading the patch carefuly and figuring it out
> myself, but since you raise this...
>
> Is that the reason then that svr4_match_pc_solist goes through
> the link map to map a PC to a so_list, instead of having a
> generic implementation that matches the PC to the so_list's
> loaded (bfd) sections (that is, just call solib_contains_address_p) ?
> If so, it'd make more sense IMO to remove that from this patch,
> and add it only along with a change that lazies mapping in the bfd
> and its sections as well. I'm not sure how safe that will be.
Thanks for the comments, both of you. After some chat with Jan, I have
decided that I will work on the second part of this task, i.e., take
care of solib_map_sections inside update_solib_list, and will only
submit a new patch when it's done.
Thank you,
Sergio.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 5:34 Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-07-20 22:01 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-21 11:13 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-21 14:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-21 15:19 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-21 20:38 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-21 18:43 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2011-07-21 19:21 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-21 20:10 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m362mvfqlh.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox