From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9016 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2011 22:03:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9004 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2011 22:03:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:03:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB8M2pFx024269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:02:51 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB8M2pPm006363; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:02:51 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB8M2mA2003796; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:02:49 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb.ada/catch_ex.exp, gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex.exp and unsupported catchpoints References: <201112061718.50031.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111207100101.GC21915@adacore.com> <20111207220119.GD21915@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111207220119.GD21915@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:01:19 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 Tom> If you can make it so this can work without debuginfo somehow, that Tom> would be much better for users. Joel> The problem is that we need to get to the argument of function we are Joel> breaking on in order to determine which exception has been raised. Joel> That's where we really need the debug info. I think I even added Joel> a comment about that in the code... Another nice feature of sdt.h probes is that you can extract arguments without debuginfo :-) Tom