From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6498 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 15:15:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 6488 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 15:15:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:15:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJFFPPO014212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:15:26 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBJFFPI6031571; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:15:25 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBJFFNDK000990; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:15:24 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [patch+7.4] reread.exp 7.3->7.4 regression References: <20111218115343.GB22534@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111218115343.GB22534@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:53:43 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00639.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> - if (data != NULL) Jan> + if (data != NULL && sec->the_bfd_section->index < data->section_count) I don't understand the need for this hunk. When can this be called in a context where the BFD doesn't match the data registered with the objfile? Tom