From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21589 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2012 05:53:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 21580 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Oct 2012 05:53:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 05:53:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q925riSA014683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 01:53:44 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-44.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.44]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q925rgoQ030380; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 01:53:43 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: LRN Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Bug win32/14529] Make gdb capable of JIT-debugging on W32 References: <503E575D.1000608@gmail.com> <506A1DB5.60901@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 05:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <506A1DB5.60901@gmail.com> (LRN's message of "Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:48:21 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On Monday, October 01 2012, LRN wrote: > On 02.10.2012 2:37, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 29 2012, LRN wrote: >> >>> To be a JIT-debugger [1] on Windows, gdb has to be able to signal >>> an event, which is passed to it by command line. If that is not >>> done, the process being debugged will not come out of a waiting >>> loop after gdb attaches to it. >> >> Sorry for being late on this thread, but do you have a copyright >> assignment on file for contributing for GDB? I don't see your name >> on gdb/MAINTAINERS. > I have a copyright assignment filed for GNUtls [1], would that suffice? Not sure, we will probably have to ask someone else. Maybe some GM knows the answer? Anyway, if you have a GNU copyright assignment for a project, I guess it is much easier to extend this to other project. >> If you do have it, please update gdb/MAINTAINERS. > I do not fit into any category. Not even Write After Approval > Maintainers, since i do not have write access to the GDB source tree. That's because you do not have a copyright assignment for GDB. *If your patch is approved and committed*, you can ask for Write After Approval at , and then you will be able to update gdb/MAINTAINERS. Thanks, -- Sergio