Re: [PATCH 2/3] Fix copy_bitwise()

Pedro Alves
2016-11-24T16:32:21Z

On 11/24/2016 04:15 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:

> Hm, I'm not quite convinced. Fooling the test with a broken algorithm
> is probably easier with regular test patterns than with pseudo-random
> ones. For instance, consider an implementation that does not advance
> the byte position in the source buffer at all.

Agreed.

>
> I do understand your concern about being "deterministic", though. Thus
> I've taken another shot, see the patch below.

Perfect!

Please push.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves