From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31750 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2008 19:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 31738 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2008 19:12:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:12:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UJ54hR015855; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:05:04 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6UJ53Ke025578; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:05:03 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-47.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.47]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6UJ52Dq008589; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:05:03 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 40EDB5086F2; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:05:02 -0600 (MDT) To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: automatic dependency tracking References: <200807301852.45352.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200807301852.45352.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed\, 30 Jul 2008 18\:52\:44 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00572.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Tom> This patch implements automatic dependency tracking for gdb. Pedro> What's the status on this? Just waiting for review. Pedro> I looked over the patch, but I'm affraid I'm no make guru Pedro> to be able to tell if it's correct, but it looks plausible, and Pedro> I trust Tom. :-) Thanks. Though... we all make mistakes :) One way you could help move this forward would be to test it on a machine that does not have GNU make. I don't have one of these. The patch probably doesn't apply cleanly any more. Unfortunately this sort of patch requires constant care to keep it up-to-date. Tom