From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10179 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2009 04:51:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 10171 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2009 04:51:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:51:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n054p43o032201; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:51:04 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n054p2BC008457; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:51:03 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-92.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.92]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n054p1CW012022; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:51:02 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 32ED150801F; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:51:00 -0700 (MST) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR 9164 References: <20090104032948.GA3339@caradoc.them.org> <20090105042336.GE31595@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090105042336.GE31595@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon\, 5 Jan 2009 08\:23\:36 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Tom> Nope. I don't know that a signed type is incorrect, either. I really Tom> know nothing about the other languages here, so I chose to preserve Tom> the current behavior. Joel> In Ada, the equivalent of the sizeof operator is the 'Size attribute. FWIW -- I believe this change only affects languages that might generate UNOP_SIZEOF in an expression. According to grep that means C (the whole family plus ObjC), Fortran, Modula-2, and Pascal. So, I think this change should not affect Ada. Tom