From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10062 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2009 18:17:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 10036 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2009 18:17:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:17:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3KIGZ0h020088; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:16:35 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3KIGXUV022456; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:16:34 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-214.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.214]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3KIGVJp006734; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:16:32 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5B56637829A; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:16:30 -0600 (MDT) To: Hui Zhu Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] Set the default of disassemble-next-line to off References: From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Sun\, 19 Apr 2009 21\:47\:25 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00526.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu writes: Hui> -If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine\n\ Hui> +If AUTO, or there's no line info to determine\n\ Hui> the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next\n\ Hui> instruction instead."), It seems to me that this should read: If AUTO, and there's no line info to determine [...] The actual code change is fine :-) thanks, Tom