From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26343 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2010 16:40:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 26332 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2010 16:40:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:40:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0JGdUqx011866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:39:32 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0JGdTQI023622; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:39:29 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0JGdRrM003726; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:39:28 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7D1B43782A6; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:39:27 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit+doco] Trust PAD types instead of using PAD___XVS. References: <1263808271-10983-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <83ska370s0.fsf@gnu.org> <20100119104243.GT17397@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100119104243.GT17397@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:42:43 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00477.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> I thought about it, and then decided against it: I think that "maint" Joel> commands should provide commands that really apply only to the Joel> maintainers I tend to agree. Joel> It's really a judgment call, as we probably have not been Joel> completely consistent in the way we name our commands... True, but that doesn't mean we must avoid having a rule for the future :-) Tom