From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7342 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2010 18:05:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 7330 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2010 18:05:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:05:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2UI5kUg021889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:05:46 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2UI5imZ026060; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:05:45 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2UI5hiV020334; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:05:43 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1B90F508258; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:05:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Phil Muldoon Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [patch] PR 11417 References: <4BB20EC0.10500@redhat.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4BB20EC0.10500@redhat.com> (Phil Muldoon's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:46:24 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg01075.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: Phil> - if (address == 0) Phil> - { Phil> - PyErr_SetString (PyExc_MemoryError, Phil> - "Cannot create a lazy string from a GDB-side string."); Phil> - return NULL; Phil> - } I agree that we should change lazy_string to be like string here. However, I think we should only allow a NULL lazy_string with length==0. Other situations don't really make sense. This also needs a test case. thanks, Tom