From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15699 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2011 19:23:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 15691 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2011 19:23:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:23:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p24JN420023382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:23:04 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p24JN48g012248; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:23:04 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p24JN3Uh027911; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:23:04 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4EAF237967C; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:23:03 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: change "program exited" message References: <201103032120.49764.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201103041913.09385.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201103041913.09385.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:13:09 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> (Do we actually need gdb_continue_off_end? It seemed Pedro> like in all but a couple of cases it was the same Pedro> as gdb_continue_to_end, except that the new function Pedro> doesn't handle using stubs.) I was not sure that this was safe to do. If you think it is ok, I can make that change. Tom