From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23700 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2011 15:30:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 23687 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2011 15:30:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:29:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2FFTtFL011570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:29:55 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2FFTskL024775; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:29:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2FFTs7b017744; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:29:54 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C119C378CA1; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:29:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches ml , Doug Evans Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Advice on fixing gdb/12528 References: <20110315004140.GA28560@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:39:39 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov writes: Paul> How does "break-on-linker-gcd-function.exp" sound? Fine by me. Paul> Yes: I noted that in gdb/12568. Paul> I am not sure how I can trigger the bug with newer GCC versions... Paul> Ah yes, I can. Jan> For a real testcase it should be in gdb.dwarf2/ (and then the special Jan> compilation options are sure no longer needed). Paul> Sorry, I didn't follow that part. Why special options wouldn't be needed? What Jan means is that you can put a .S file into gdb.dwarf2. That way the test is independent of compiler version (but unfortunately then dependent on arch). Tom