From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17655 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2011 20:31:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17646 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2011 20:31:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:31:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3EKVioA025591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:31:45 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3EKVh7f019253; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:31:43 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3EKVfhP019714; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:31:42 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id BBFC937831C; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:31:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: , "'Maxim Grigoriev'" Subject: Re: [RFA] xtensa-tdep.c ARI fixes References: <15837.6740910628$1302342165@news.gmane.org> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15837.6740910628$1302342165@news.gmane.org> (Pierre Muller's message of "Sat, 9 Apr 2011 11:42:29 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> The only non-trivial change is in xtensa_register_type: Pierre> this is mainly because I do not understand the old code: Pierre> it was using both xmalloc and strdup, which should Pierre> create a memory leak, no? Pierre> But maybe I miss something? I agree. Pierre> - char *name = xmalloc (16); Pierre> + char *name = xstrprintf ("int%d", size * 8); Looks better. Pierre> + = arch_integer_type (gdbarch, size * 8, 1, name); arch_integer_type calls arch_type, which calls xstrdup(name). So I think you need to xfree name here. Tom