From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3614 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2011 20:03:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 3603 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Oct 2011 20:03:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SARE_SUB_IMPROVE,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:03:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p94K336m030729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:03:03 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p94K330R017371; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:03:03 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p94K32e5024762; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:03:02 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve performance with lots of shared libraries References: <20110909123156.GA1503@redhat.com> <20110909145110.GB12299@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110909145110.GB12299@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:51:10 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> Tom is working on removing the program space from the breakpoint Jan> itself. Or at least Tom was discussing its removal. Yeah, I think we should remove the pspace and gdbarch fields from struct breakpoint, because these don't make sense in a multi-location, multi-inferior world. I have not looked yet to see how hard this is. >> +static int >> +multi_thread_support_availabie (void) Jan> This should be in target.c (and probably renamed). Yeah, there's a typo in the name :-) Tom