From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1510 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2011 15:58:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 1496 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2011 15:58:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:58:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAEFwNsa019274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:58:23 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAEFwNOY013858; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:58:23 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAEFwL7Z013772; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:58:21 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: "Jon Beniston" Cc: "'Werner Almesberger'" , Subject: Re: [PATCH] 32 bit-ism in lm32-tdep.c (and some sloppy macros) References: <20111111233808.GA10815@ws> <000001cca2e5$b4dfad30$1e9f0790$@beniston.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <000001cca2e5$b4dfad30$1e9f0790$@beniston.com> (Jon Beniston's message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:54:35 -0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jon" == Jon Beniston writes: Jon> I'm not sure that sign-extends? Yeah. What am I thinking? The original patch is OK with a ChangeLog entry. Tom