From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4274 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2012 06:55:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 4265 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2012 06:55:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:54:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q956sumV021861 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 02:54:57 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-44.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.44]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q956srjd019213; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 02:54:54 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: dje@google.com Cc: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [doc RFA] New option -nh References: <20589.50581.949799.342799@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20589.50581.949799.342799@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> (dje@google.com's message of "Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:21:25 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 On Thursday, October 04 2012, dje@google.com wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior writes: > > Do you intend to patch gdb/gdb.1 (manpage)? I know it is really > > outdated compared to the info page, but it exists and people use it, so > > I would vote for documenting this new option there as well. > > How about this? Sorry for the delay. Thanks, it's fine by me. -- Sergio