From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30009 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2008 22:35:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 30001 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2008 22:35:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:35:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5FMZLEn031263; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:35:21 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5FMZKre019088; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:35:20 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-27.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.27]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5FMZKAT006573; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:35:20 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E8AD6378140; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:35:19 -0600 (MDT) To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 3/9] export hooks mechanism to Python References: <20080429155212.444237503@br.ibm.com> <20080429155304.641779989@br.ibm.com> <20080528212612.GC2969@caradoc.them.org> <20080615183110.xi9zc6qx2iokwwsg@imap.linux.ibm.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080615183110.xi9zc6qx2iokwwsg@imap.linux.ibm.com> (Thiago Jung Bauermann's message of "Sun\, 15 Jun 2008 18\:31\:10 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Thiago" == Thiago Jung Bauermann writes: >> Yeah, that's right. Thiago> Here's the new version. Funnily enough I was just thinking about this code today. In particular I was wondering if we ought to expose observers to Python more directly -- say by having a generic way for a Python object to register with a given observer. Tom