From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6657 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2008 17:49:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 6627 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2008 17:49:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:49:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAMHmtn6007093; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:48:55 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAMHmso1002083; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:48:54 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-17.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.17]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAMHmr7i024119; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:48:53 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D2FA8378BCD; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:48:52 -0700 (MST) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: move value_from_contents_and_address to value.c References: <20081122050546.GB4318@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20081122050546.GB4318@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri\, 21 Nov 2008 21\:05\:46 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00613.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> I'm wondering whether the offset parameter is really necessary? Would it Joel> be worse to call this function with valaddr+embedded_offset rather Joel> than passing two arguments? I will remove it and resubmit. Tom