From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31897 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2009 13:50:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 31888 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2009 13:50:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:50:20 +0000 Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n3FDo0dv017746; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:50:01 +0100 Received: from smtp.corp.google.com (spacemonkey1.corp.google.com [192.168.120.115]) by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n3FDnwGe006591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:49:59 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (67-218-110-112.cust.layer42.net [67.218.110.112] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.corp.google.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3FDnt4H030132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:49:57 -0700 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: joseph@codesourcery.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: needed-list fails in libiberty References: <83vdp7mile.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5zvmh5v.fsf@gnu.org> <837i1mmiyh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <837i1mmiyh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed\, 15 Apr 2009 11\:15\:02 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-System-Of-Record: true Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > 2009-04-14 Eli Zaretskii >> > >> > * Makefile.in (needed-list): Target removed (not used in GCC >> > 3.0 and later). All references deleted. >> >> This is OK if you've done a clean bootstrap on a primary platform. > > You mean, bootstrapping GCC? Or something else? Yes, bootstrapping gcc. This is a normal requirement for a gcc patch, as documented at http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing . My concern here is merely to make sure that we aren't missing a hidden dependency of libstdc++ on libiberty; such dependencies have certainly been missed in the past. For a patch like this only the libiberty testsuite need be run. > Would this platform be good enough? > > Linux fencepost 2.6.16.29-xen #1 SMP Wed Dec 6 07:32:36 EST 2006 x86_64 GNU/Linux Yes. The current list of primary platforms may be found at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html . Thanks. Ian