From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12036 invoked by alias); 27 May 2011 17:53:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 12024 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2011 17:53:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:53:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4RHrKFt022677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 May 2011 13:53:21 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4RHrKPU009284; Fri, 27 May 2011 13:53:20 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4RHrJrN009493; Fri, 27 May 2011 13:53:20 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6DF693781BA; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:53:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver) References: <4DDF196F.5010202@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4DDF196F.5010202@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 27 May 2011 11:24:31 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00643.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> Maybe, we need a new target `remote-valgrind' here, and move your Yao> stuff there. We discussed this a bit (last year?), but Pedro was against adding a new target. I don't recall why; I would like to know though. Tom