From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18154 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2011 14:40:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 18145 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2011 14:40:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:40:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6PEe7Mf027760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:40:07 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6PEe6tw029168; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:40:07 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6PEe56O032511; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:40:05 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Matt Rice Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Be in language c more c++ compatible References: <20110715191920.GA29975@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110724125222.GA8403@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Matt Rice's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2011 06:48:07 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00689.txt.bz2 Matt> what made me think of it, is the last time I was debugging a mixed Matt> c++/objective-c program, having to call 'set language', was extremely Matt> annoying, to the point that I added commands to my .gdbinit to lighten Matt> the churn. Adding real support for ObjC++ would be by far the best solution. Tom