From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30805 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2011 16:46:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 30797 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2011 16:46:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:45:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p93GjpWa019598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:45:51 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p93GjoSl013219; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:45:50 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p93Gjmn8024554; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:45:49 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Abhijit Halder Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PR 9514] Fixing parse error for "pointer to a function pointer" References: <201109291210.01022.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Abhijit Halder's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:55:21 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Abhijit" == Abhijit Halder writes: Abhijit> I am re-submitting the whole thing once again for ease of review. This patch needs a patch to the testsuite as well. Any simple parser fix should come with a test, as it is easy to do. Also, please look at my earlier patch for this bug. I think it shows some cases that your patch does not address: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-08/msg00539.html Perhaps I ought to simply commit that patch. I am not sure why I never have. What do you think? Tom