From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16610 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2011 19:53:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 16598 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Oct 2011 19:53:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:53:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9EJrQGG015902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:53:26 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9EJrPtM013454; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:53:26 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9EJrNYh029097; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:53:24 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joost van der Sluis Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patch to fix crash on mingw and nil-typenames. References: <1318408512.25241.30.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> <4E95A721.4060707@codesourcery.com> <1318434669.4736.1.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1318434669.4736.1.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> (Joost van der Sluis's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:51:09 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joost" == Joost van der Sluis writes: Joost> Yes, sorry for the mistake. I don't think I have to re-send it, but that Joost> when it is committed, the person who does this can change this, no? I'm fixing this and checking it in. In the future you'll need an assignment in place and have to get write-after-approval access. If you plan to hack more on gdb, and don't have papers in place (I don't know) then contact me off-list to get started. Tom