From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1637 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2011 17:06:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 1621 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2011 17:06:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:06:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBFH5sGF031961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:05:54 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBFH5rvP008398; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:05:53 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBFH5pGd015234; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:05:51 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: creating the gdb-7.4 branch tomorrow (?) References: <20111205081911.GG28486@adacore.com> <20111214190203.GV21915@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111214190203.GV21915@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:02:03 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> You isolated this patch as the source of the problem, but I don't see Joel> that with my testing. My investigation leads me to believe that the Joel> problem might been there for some time. Not sure of all the details, Joel> yet. But a little bit of help determining when this stopped working Joel> for you would be helpful. When did this work last for you? (a SHA1 Joel> would be convenient, but a date is equally ok). I was able to reproduce it on the GCC compile farm -- which, BTW, has a 64-core PPC box, quite nice to work on :-) The old code used lookup_minimal_symbol, which falls back to file-local symbols and trampoline symbols if the main symbol is not found. The new code rejects these, though. I am looking into how to fix it. Tom