From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13076 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2013 18:03:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13040 invoked by uid 89); 16 Dec 2013 18:03:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:03:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBGI3rCd002002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:03:54 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-60.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.60]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBGI3o41016529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:03:52 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR breakpoints/16297: Fix catch syscall to work with syscall 0 References: <87fvpu4vgh.fsf@lestat.krisman.be> <52AF3DA0.3020406@redhat.com> <52AF3F0F.3030107@redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52AF3F0F.3030107@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:57:35 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00593.txt.bz2 On Monday, December 16 2013, Pedro Alves wrote: > Bah, got distracted by something else, and forgot to write the > bit that made me want to reply in the first place. :-P > > I meant to say that I think this is small enough to not be > legally significant and so it can go in before the copyright > assignment is in place. Feel free to push it in. Thanks :-). If it is OK to you, I will wait until my other patch touching catch-syscall.exp is approved, so that I can write a simple extension to the testcase that will test this specific bug. Then, I can commit both patches (this one and the testcase one) together. -- Sergio