From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9938 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2009 00:47:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9930 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2009 00:47:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:47:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n070liwW001063 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:47:44 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n070lhVN004930; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:47:44 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-46.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.46]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n070lhAN010450; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:47:43 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B42D8378095; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:47:41 -0700 (MST) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: fix a memory leak in value.c References: <20090106232916.GA1496@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090106232916.GA1496@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Tue\, 6 Jan 2009 18\:29\:16 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> After the content-allocation change, values must be freed using >> value_free, not xfree. Daniel> OK, thanks. Thanks, I've checked this in. Tom