From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16876 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 21:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 16868 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 21:28:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:27:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2HLRD6n010186; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:27:13 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-28.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.28]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2HLRDH0014141; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:27:14 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6FA80508085; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:27:11 -0600 (MDT) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] New gdb_usleep function? References: <20090317161240.GB31959@adacore.com> <20090317211249.GH31979@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090317211249.GH31979@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue\, 17 Mar 2009 17\:12\:49 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00337.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> This is not an objection, but I was wondering whether you looked at >> using the gnulib usleep replacement function. Joel> Actually, I did. AFAICT, gnulib doesn't provide gnulib... Oh, sorry ... I misread the text I saw. thanks, Tom