From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6550 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2009 20:48:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 6541 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2009 20:48:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:48:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n77KmUNV003854 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:48:30 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n77KmTHR028967; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:48:29 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n77KmS3B006737; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:48:28 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 286D8378580; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:48:28 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: fix PR gdb/8869 References: From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri\, 07 Aug 2009 14\:42\:30 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I'm checking this in. Tom> A long time ago I sent a different patch to fix PR 8869 (then called Tom> PR 1764, since we were still using Gnats). Daniel reminded me that I neglected to describe the problem. The problem here is that "set language" does not complete properly. I took the opportunity to fix a couple other completion bugs in language.c at the same time. The comments in the code say that this should use an enum, but that looked like more of a pain than what I did. Tom