From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15884 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2010 16:16:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15865 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2010 16:16:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:16:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1NGG62T020343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:06 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1NGG5sk001364; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:05 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1NGG4i4030129; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:04 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 12C31378190; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:16:04 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: fix big-endian bug with DWARF_VALUE_STACK References: Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:08:32 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> Jakub noticed a bug with DWARF expressions on big-endian machines. Tom> This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567251 It was pointed out to me that this is a private bug, so you won't be able to read it. I can supply the test case if anybody wants it. Tom