From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14641 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2010 17:02:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 14224 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2010 17:02:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:01:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o29H1q5o021542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:01:53 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o29H1pmg013337; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:01:51 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o29H1oYq031916; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:01:50 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E176388844B; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:01:49 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: Subject: Re: [RFA-v2] Fix cygwin compilation failure for python code References: <14243.7868555591$1268066303@news.gmane.org> <000201cabf98$13907950$3ab16bf0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <000201cabf98$13907950$3ab16bf0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> (Pierre Muller's message of "Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:52:01 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> You are right, this is easier, but I was suspecting that the Pierre> original writers of this header wanted it to NOT depend on any Pierre> real gdb header... FWIW I'm one of the original authors. I don't think it really matters here. I'd rather have excess includes than try to deal with include ordering problems. Pierre> Is this version OK? Yes, thanks. Tom