From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-81721-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8472 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2011 17:24:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 8463 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2011 17:24:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:24:29 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5MHO9xT014753	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:24:09 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5MHO8Uq014335;	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:24:09 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5MHO7v0016692;	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:24:07 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [0/2] more OO, Ada exception catchpoints: intro
References: <201106221420.08780.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:24:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <201106221420.08780.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:20:08 +0100")
Message-ID: <m31uyl6aq1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> (serving as proof/excuse for me to add a few more bits to
Pedro> breakpoint_ops and export a few functions from breakpoint.c :-)
Pedro> ).

As far as I'm concerned, you don't need an excuse to do this.
I think it would be best if all breakpoints had to use breakpoint_ops
and there were no switches in breakpoint.c, just indirect calls.

Tom