From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23708 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2011 19:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23700 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2011 19:56:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:56:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5SJuUEo011816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:56:30 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5SJuUmG030739; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:56:30 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5SJuSDx026290; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:56:29 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Disable epilogue unwinders on recent GCCs [Re: Regression: Re: [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies] References: <201106122057.p5CKvUEa030437@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20110613104911.GA1965@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110626084140.GB28242@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110626084140.GB28242@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:41:41 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> I find questionable this detection uses DWARF DW_AT_producer. Me too, but unless GCC emits some other new bit, I don't see how else we could reasonably get this information. Tom