From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11760 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2011 17:33:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11748 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2011 17:33:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:33:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6SHX1Sg032581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:33:01 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6SHX05e020743; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:33:00 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6SHWwUS010261; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:32:58 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: iam ahal Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) References: <20110627160029.GF20676@adacore.com> <834o33qlm9.fsf@gnu.org> <83bowq6x7f.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:17:23 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00794.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: iam> + add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("skip-compile-dir", class_obscure, Tom> I'm not especially fond of this name. Tom> I don't have a better suggestion though. How about "set backtrace filename-display"? With possible values "full" and "filename"? Then we can add "basename" later if we care to. Tom