From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84364-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10325 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2011 17:07:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 10314 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2011 17:07:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:06:47 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9CH6fAq016550	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:06:41 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9CH6f27003565;	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:06:41 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9CH6ehW021062;	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:06:40 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][Python] gdbpy_frame_stop_reason_string bug
References: <CAPftXULjbKonB=-YneTVg+jeZiUDUruqtjrTighL8dgXTWoo_g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAPftXUJ_cfH=jX4CVjokXpJpJfNkPF4OCgLceNitbnPbnrQ+Mg@mail.gmail.com>	<m3y5wqmdpj.fsf@redhat.com>	<201110121659.13715.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:07:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <201110121659.13715.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:59:13 +0100")
Message-ID: <m31uui6sww.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> We should definitely reimplement these enums in a table in a
Pedro> .def file.  That's 2 places already that map the enums to
Pedro> something else.  This one is missing UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE.

Makes sense to me.

Pedro> And what do you think of making UNWIND_FIRST_ERROR
Pedro> an alias like in my patch?  Do you think that's likely
Pedro> to break anything?

I think it would be fine.

Tom